partially elastic 問題 (momentum)
今日牙sir 講 elastic collision 分做 perfectly elastic 同 partially ealstic而且 partially elastic 有energy loss during collision
但係 inelastic 唔係都有相同意思嗎??
究竟點分幫幫手唔該 Inelastic collision---> all KE lost...
Partially elastic collision---> part of the KE lost
perfectly elastic collision---> no KE lost (perfectly/completely) elastic: no KE loss (KE is conserved)
Inelastic: KE is lost (KE is not conserved)
In particular, perfectly/completely inelastic: maxium KE loss 原帖由 Puppet 於 7-4-2008 19:51 發表 http://www.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
(perfectly/completely) elastic: no KE loss (KE is conserved)
Inelastic: KE is lost (KE is not conserved)
In particular, perfectly/completely inelastic: maxium KE loss
原來我記錯左[] 原帖由 Puppet 於 7-4-2008 19:51 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
(perfectly/completely) elastic: no KE loss (KE is conserved)
Inelastic: KE is lost (KE is not conserved)
In particular, perfectly/completely inelastic: maxium KE loss
但係我牙sir話 partially elastic 都有ke lost
咁究竟partially elastic 同inelastic 有咩分別? 一個loss 晒, 一個未loss晒囉. 原帖由 【YU】 於 7-4-2008 20:43 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
一個loss 晒, 一個未loss晒囉.
LOSS 曬好似係 completely inelastic
loss 唔曬 先係inelastic 原帖由 chiu1992 於 7-4-2008 21:00 發表 http://www.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
LOSS 曬好似係 completely inelastic
loss 唔曬 先係inelastic
有loss就是inelastic
loss係maxium就是inelastic內的completely inelastic
唔係"lost哂就是completely inelastic" 原帖由 Puppet 於 7-4-2008 21:06 發表 http://www2.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
有loss就是inelastic
loss係maxium就是inelastic內的completely inelastic
唔係"lost哂就是completely inelastic"
係的- -""
但係請問一下..... 究竟 partially elastic 同 inelastic有咩分別呢? 原帖由 chiu1992 於 8-4-2008 18:08 發表 http://www.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
係的- -""
但係請問一下..... 究竟 partially elastic 同 inelastic有咩分別呢?
字眼ge分別而已...難道世界上所有字都應該不同意思嗎??[]
我估係咁
頁:
[1]
2