原帖由 ~緣起緣滅~ 於 31-8-2008 16:53 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
學你甘講lo
鑽石是元素
得未？
元素週期表上面多左個叫Diamond
化學符號叫Di
好未？
1. "Graphite is element"的意義不在於在Periodic table在carbon以外有樣野叫graphite, 有樣野叫diamond
Can't you see this? Aren't you blind, or brainless?
2. Up til now, ~緣起緣滅~ has not reponded to what ~緣起緣滅~implies: "graphite is a compound." which is wrong.
3. Up til now, ~緣起緣滅~ has been discussing based on no rational logic, no sources, and no evidence. His only point is that: "it sounds strange."
That is like when people didn't accept "the world is not flat", they based on nothing.
[ 本帖最後由 Puppet 於 31-8-2008 17:23 編輯 ]
金屬是由metallic bond來維繫
咁係咪element??
我concept唔好,搵人教我[]
原帖由 ~緣起緣滅~ 於 31-8-2008 05:20 PM 發表 http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
鑽石係元素 一粒碳都係元素 石墨係元素 元素週期表原來係呃我地[]
你的思想仲停留係d ...
元素唔係得一樣野, 元素係pure substance 的一種
佢地係元素, 係因為佢地只有一種原子(carbon) 所組成的東西
你自己check 番定義先啦, 定義wins everything
元素週期表比你這樣用的??? 你無野ma ?
law of periodicity不是這樣啊
那你立場, 佢地點解係compounds? ( elements 你的已知不是, 請提出你的所謂理據支持)
仲有, 你到底係唔係唔識中文
我叫你去找番元素的定義,你完全無理過
幾乎問過晒所有係大學讀書既人全部都話唔可以直接當鑽石係element
AL比你拎A又點＠∼＠講晒粗野仲要比人扣分的版主
原帖由 ~緣起緣滅~ 於 31-8-2008 17:20 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
鑽石係元素 一粒碳都係元素 石墨係元素 元素週期表原來係呃我地[]
No no no
The periodic table of the elements is a great job, and it never deceived you or anyone else.
It is nobody but you who has been deceiving your own and other people.
Carbon is an element, and it exists as many forms.
We name one of the forms "graphite".
And you fool says graphite is not an element.
And you then blame the fantastic periodic table.
What a shame!
原帖由 ~緣起緣滅~ 於 31-8-2008 05:27 PM 發表 http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
幾乎問過晒所有係大學讀書既人全部都話唔可以直接當鑽石係element
AL比你拎A又點＠∼＠講晒粗野仲要比人扣分的版主
請講原因
沒有原因的證據, 同垃圾有咩分別?
比人扣分, 同AL 拎A, 又或者同我講野的說服力係無乜關係
你果d 思維可唔可以正常d ?
Up til now, ~緣起緣滅~ has been discussing based on no rational logic, no sources, and no evidence. His only point is that: "it sounds strange."
原帖由 ~緣起緣滅~ 於 31-8-2008 17:27 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
幾乎問過晒所有係大學讀書既人全部都話唔可以直接當鑽石係element
AL比你拎A又點＠∼＠講晒粗野仲要比人扣分的版主
I really understand that...
If you get into the university, you will also says that 唔可以直接當鑽石係element.
They are your friends. Irrational people gather.
[ 本帖最後由 Puppet 於 31-8-2008 17:35 編輯 ]
原帖由 Puppet 於 31-8-2008 17:28 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
No no no
The periodic table of the elements is a great job, and it never deceived you or anyone else.
It is nobody but you who has been deceiving your own and other people.
Carbon is an element,...
你都識講係一種存在既形式啦[]
原帖由 ~緣起緣滅~ 於 31-8-2008 17:30 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
你都識講係一種存在既形式啦[]
Of course I know because that is fact.
And because of this, graphite and diamond are element.
carbon which exists as graphite is carbon.
diamond which exists as diamond is carbon.