原帖由 NickHung 於 16-12-2008 19:22 發表 http://www1.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
你令住支狙行頭,如果你真係企係到等佢上彈,我相信支支都一定慢
我按r>打開佢>上彈完成,咁叫慢,我冇野好講,係你ge問題
粒粒都4~5隻係睇你點用,多怪果陣一定得
你同我講成條街得一隻果陣我吹你唔漲
>其實吹水,唔該 ...
你話:
彈15粒,但我1粒都殺4~5隻
所以冇缺點
e+你又係度話多怪先得
咁成條街d喪屍分散哂
狙咪有缺點lo
摘錄於 gamespot L4D forum 其中一篇關於武器對 EXPERT TANK 造成的傷害比較 http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/left4dead/show_msgs.php?topic_id=m-1-46769872&pid=937406&tag=topics;title
Using my own completely unscientific methods I have determined how manyshots it takes to kill a Tank, on expert, with the M16. auto-shotgun,sniper rifle, and dual pistols.
For the M16, auto-shotgun andsniper rifle I verified my results by doing the tests three times in arow, each with the same results. I did the same with dual pistols,however I came across 3 different (although similar) results.
M16
It takes exactly 5 clips.
Auto-Shotgun
29 rounds.
Sniper Rifle
Surprisingly 89 rounds.Personally I was guessing it would be somewhere in the ball park as the auto-shotgun.
Dual Pistols
Dualpistols was the only weapon to show some inconsistency, which wasprobably my own fault. The results ended up as 7 clips + 25 rounds, 7clips + 26 rounds, & 7 clips + 22 rounds.
Propane Tank Experiment
Iplaced two propane tanks within one to two feet of the Tank, walkedback about forty feet, and shot them. Then I reloaded and counted howmany rounds it would take to kill the Tank with an M16. In anothersurprise it took nearly five clips! I only did this test once, andagain there was probably some error on my part, but it still tooknearly five complete clips.
Locational Damage
I was alsofooling around and found out there is no locational damage, at least asfar as the Tank is concerned. You can put five clips into his back orfive clips into his face and it does not matter.
...
雖然沒指中打哪個位置會比較痛
但只看result的話
auto-shotgun的確對tank造成最大傷害
並不是sniper
另外我看過一篇"對於燃燒中的tank，射牠會否加速牠的死亡?"
答案是:
in campaign : no
in versus : yes
*的確sniper的對一般喪屍力十分強
但對於開路 / 打tank還是散彈較好
我只能說每支槍都有自己的優勢
不能說哪支是王道
[ 本帖最後由 thectc 於 21-12-2008 00:36 編輯 ]
狙打專家級可以話係必要的~
冇狙會打得辛苦@V@....
本帖最後由 幻之射神 於 1-1-2009 23:06 編輯
你令住支狙行頭,如果你真係企係到等佢上彈,我相信支支都一定慢
我按r>打開佢>上彈完成,咁叫慢,我冇野好講,係你ge問題
粒粒都4~5隻係睇你點用,多怪果陣一定得
你同我講成條街得一隻果陣我吹你唔漲
>其實吹水,唔該吹好 ...
NickHung 發表於 16-12-2008 19:22 http://www.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
講到自己好勁
成就仲少過我呢d"廢人"
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197977298567/stats/L4D
呢個係我既
http://steamcommunity.com/id/kelvinthh/stats/L4D
狙的最大用處就只有打Boomer, Hunter, Smoker這三隻小Boss
但必須使用者警覺性十分高
才能作後方強大支援
同時可以超遠距離解救有活動能力的隊友
本人間中也會用
講到自己好勁
成就仲少過我呢d"廢人"
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197977298567/stats/L4D
呢個係我既
http://steamcommunity.com/id/kelvinthh/stats/L4D
幻之射神 發表於 1-1-2009 23:03 http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
你班傻佬又係到 學人"以事論事"!?
講人地自己 又咪係哂命
人地分享緊經驗呀 "未來板主" 個post比你係到扮狗叫架? 冇事搵野黎嘈
改過改過...wow...道歉 wow...~~ 聽得多
http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=3529811&extra=page%3D1
你想笑死人咩..
狙係高位有用,但係比屍群sm用m16好d
你班傻佬又係到 學人"以事論事"!?
講人地自己 又咪係哂命
人地分享緊經驗呀 "未來板主" 個post比你係到扮狗叫架? 冇事搵野黎嘈
改過改過...wow...道歉 wow...~~ 聽得多
http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=3 ...
樂古人渣 發表於 1-1-2009 23:22 http://www4.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
你可唔可以認真睇post
大把人都覺佢晒命or認叻
講到自己好勁
成就仲少過我呢d"廢人"
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197977298567/stats/L4D
呢個係我既
http://steamcommunity.com/id/kelvinthh/stats/L4D
幻之射神 發表於 1-1-2009 23:03 http://www.nakuz.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif
雖則我都唔多同意果條友講ge 野
但我想講番一句就係成就多=/=技術高
唔係個個會刻意去解成就
更何況成就呢家野有得做馬咁做出黎
成就多 =/= 勁
成就少 = noob