摘錄於 gamespot L4D forum 其中一篇關於武器對 EXPERT TANK 造成的傷害比較 
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/left4dead/show_msgs.php?topic_id=m-1-46769872&pid=937406&tag=topics;title
Using my own completely unscientific methods I have determined how manyshots it takes to kill a Tank, on expert, with the M16. auto-shotgun,sniper rifle, and dual pistols.
For the M16, auto-shotgun andsniper rifle I verified my results by doing the tests three times in arow, each with the same results. I did the same with dual pistols,however I came across 3 different (although similar) results.
M16
It takes exactly 5 clips.
Auto-Shotgun
29 rounds.
Sniper Rifle
Surprisingly 89 rounds. Personally I was guessing it would be somewhere in the ball park as the auto-shotgun.
Dual Pistols
Dualpistols was the only weapon to show some inconsistency, which wasprobably my own fault. The results ended up as 7 clips + 25 rounds, 7clips + 26 rounds, & 7 clips + 22 rounds.
Propane Tank Experiment
Iplaced two propane tanks within one to two feet of the Tank, walkedback about forty feet, and shot them. Then I reloaded and counted howmany rounds it would take to kill the Tank with an M16. In anothersurprise it took nearly five clips! I only did this test once, andagain there was probably some error on my part, but it still tooknearly five complete clips.
Locational Damage
I was alsofooling around and found out there is no locational damage, at least asfar as the Tank is concerned. You can put five clips into his back orfive clips into his face and it does not matter.
...
雖然沒指中打哪個位置會比較痛
但只看result的話
auto-shotgun的確對tank造成最大傷害
並不是sniper
另外我看過一篇"對於燃燒中的tank，射牠會否加速牠的死亡?"
答案是:
in campaign : no
in versus : yes
*的確sniper的對一般喪屍力十分強
但對於開路 / 打tank還是散彈較好
我只能說每支槍都有自己的優勢
不能說哪支是王道
[ 本帖最後由 thectc 於 21-12-2008 00:36 編輯 ] |
發表於 18-12-2008 15:59:54
